What Were the Gemstones of the Breastplate of Aaron?
In Exodus, the breastplate of Aaron was said to hold 12 gems. Discover the historical debate around it and learn about jacinth's identity across time, the true nature of biblical chrysolite and sapphire, and gemological translation challenges.
2 Minute Read
Answer: Matching the names ancient people used for gemstones to modern gem names can be difficult. We must contend not only with translations but also the fact that the ancients didn't identify gems the same way we do today.
In biblical archaeology, few artifacts generate as much gemological debate as the breastplate of Aaron. Ancient texts describing these sacred gemstones create challenges in translation and identification. In this article, you will learn:
- The complexities of matching ancient gemstone names to their modern counterparts.
- How historical references to jacinth likely describe modern-day sapphire rather than zircon.
- Why biblical "chrysolite" refers to peridot and "sapphire" to lapis lazuli.
- The evidence supporting these controversial gem identifications.
Identifying the Controversial Gemstones in the Breastplate of Aaron
Exodus describes Aaron's breastplate with 12 precious gemstones. Scholars debate the true identities of stones like jacinth and sapphire in these ancient texts.
Ancient people identified gems differently than we do today. We face challenges with translations and different classification systems. The ancients focused on color and appearance rather than mineral composition or crystal structure.
What Is Jacinth in Biblical Gemstone References?
The name jacinth, or hyacinth, now refers usually to the orange-red and red-brown varieties of zircon. However, the classical Greek name huakinthos (Rev 21:20) appears to have been our blue sapphire. The Greeks generally referred to hyacinthus as blue. (However, the Roman scholar Pliny the Elder speaks of it as golden colored).
In the New American Standard Bible and the New International Version accounts of the breastplate of Aaron (Exodus 28:19; 39:12), hyacinth is used instead of the "ligure" of the King James Version for the Hebrew leshem. In these cases, the name apparently refers to a deep yellow gem, possibly our zircon. Nevertheless, the Septuagint, the Greek Old Testament, uses huakinthos for the Hebrew tekelet in all the descriptions of the Tabernacle furnishings. The English versions use blue. Since various ancient writers refer to hyacinthus as some shade of blue, there can be little question that jacinth is our sapphire.
Hope this helps,
Hank
Historical Identities of Biblical Chrysolite and Sapphire in Aaron's Breastplate
I must respectfully disagree with the original poster's identifications. It is my opinion that the "chrysolite" in the breastplate of Aaron is not chrysoberyl at all. Rather, it's another term for what we now call peridot.
One other item which may be of interest. The biblical term "sapphire" was not always the sapphire we know today. "Sapphire" in the Mediterranean and Middle East in biblical times was almost always what we now refer to as lapis lazuli.
I'm fascinated by the gemstones of the breastplate of Aaron as well as the foundation stones of the New Testament. Interesting subjects, aren't they?
Gregory
International Gem Society
Related Articles
Should I Make an Investment in Bargain Rubies?
Pricing Information For Star Opals From Spencer, Idaho
Can You Identify Gems Without Seeing Gemstone Colors?
An Introduction to Conflict Diamonds and the Kimberley Process
Latest Articles
The Dichroscope: A Faceter’s Guide
The Microscope: A Guide for Gemologists
Anatase Value, Price, and Jewelry Information
Choosing an Emerald Engagement Ring Stone
Never Stop Learning
When you join the IGS community, you get trusted diamond & gemstone information when you need it.
Get Gemology Insights
Get started with the International Gem Society’s free guide to gemstone identification. Join our weekly newsletter & get a free copy of the Gem ID Checklist!